Opposition urges Chang to withdraw 'blood money' comment

 

 

A political firestorm is brewing after comments by National Security and Peace Minister Dr. Horace Chang implying a civil society group is being financed through illicit means. 

 

The comment, which has drawn sharp backlash from civil society and commentators, has also prompted similar criticism from Opposition Spokesperson on National Security Fitz Jackson.

 

In a radio interview on Monday, Dr. Chang said Jamaicans for Justice (JFJ) was being funded through so-called blood money.

 

Mr. Jackson has characterised the statement as unfortunate, reckless, inappropriate, and deeply unbecoming of the minister charged with oversight of the country's security architecture.

 

He said the comments represent a troubling attack on a recognised civil society organisation that has long been engaged in advocacy around justice, accountability, and human rights in Jamaica, during periods of political parties' incumbency in government of the day. 

 

It is why he is demanding the minister retract the statement.  

 

"Jamaica needs mature and responsible leadership that encourages constructive engagement with all stakeholders, including civil society, in a collective effort to make our country safer for all. I urge the minister to humbly withdraw the statement and recommit to respectful, responsible engagement on issues of public safety, policing and accountability, for which no person or entity is exempt," he stressed.

 

Dr. Chang, when he made the controversial comment, was addressing criticisms over increased police fatal shootings and a lack of accountability.

 

The security minister accused the civil society groups of undermining the work of the police while being beneficiaries of blood money.

 

But Mr. Jackson contends that the role of civil society, including JFJ, should not be minimised. 

 

"In a democracy, civil society plays a legitimate and necessary role in strengthening institutions, providing transparency and fostering public confidence in the rule of law. Responsible leadership demands measured language, especially on matters involving human rights, police accountability and the protection of life. National security is far too serious to be politicised through hostile commentary," insisted the opposition spokesman.