The National Environment and Planning Agency has released the agreement signed between the Natural Resources Conservation Authority and Trade Winds Citrus Limited.
According to the agreement, which has been uploaded to NEPA's website, a mediation session was held with the parties via Zoom on October 2, to discuss an amicable settlement of the court proceedings.
Arising from the mediation, Trade Winds agreed to take all reasonable steps to expand use of best environmental practices across its operations. The company also promised to collaborate with NEPA and community groups in environmental monitoring of the areas of the river adjacent to its properties.
Consequent to these assurances from Trade Winds, the agreement further outlined that the NRCA would immediately withdraw the court proceedings and seek a nolle prosequi in the St. Catherine parish court on or before the November 27 court date.
The agreement also made it clear that Trade Winds would be absolved of any claims, demands, suits or actions in relation to the oil spill. The parties also agreed that there would be no future lawsuit in relation to the court proceedings.
According to the confidentiality clause in the agreement, any disclosure of the contents would entitle the non-offending party to sue for damages and any other appropriate relief.
Meanwhile, CEO of Jamaica Environment Trust, Dr. Theresa Rodriguez Moodie, said she is concerned that the agreement is vague in relation to the remedial steps to be taken by Trade Winds. She added that it did not go far enough to warrant a withdrawal of the court proceedings.
"Who defines what is reasonable? How do we know that these steps will be taken? There's a lot generalities, there's a lot of discretion here, and I can't see that that was enough for NRCA to immediately withdraw from the prosecution or the court proceedings."
She also expressed concern that the agreement stated that Trade Winds has accepted "full and final settlement", so no further action can be taken in the case.
"What if Trade Winds doesn't follow through with what they have said? How do we know what is reasonable? There are a lot of question marks here," she contended.
Dr. Rodriguez Moodie also lamented that the community was not part of the discussions in relation to the agreement.