Advertisement

Golding maintains that he was blocked by Speaker from introducing bill

 

Opposition Leader Mark Golding has maintained that he was blocked by the Speaker of the House of Representatives from introducing a bill to reduce the number of years before people can claim ownership of Crown lands that they have occupied.

This after Speaker Juliet Holness challenged claims by the Opposition Leader that she blocked his efforts to introduce the bill.

The Speaker made it clear that the bill wasn't allowed in July due to constitutional issues highlighted in the document.

Mr Golding stood his ground, insisting that he was blocked and that the advice provided was flawed.

In a video statement after the sitting, he said he was prevented from proceeding with the matter, “on the basis of the Speaker and an attorney within the parliamentary system having concluded that aspects of the bill were unconstitutional.”

He argued that it was “quite improper for them to reach such a conclusion because that is not their role.”

Constitutional issues

Early in Tuesday's sitting of the House, Speaker Holness had declared that Mr Goldig's bill was not allowed in July due to constitutional issues highlighted in the document. 

"Upon review, three provisions in the bill had been identified as raising constitutional concerns following legal advice from the Parliament's legal counsel. The Leader of the Opposition was advised and subsequently revised the bill nearing midnight on July 30, 2026. Following review, two concerns were resolved. One remained unresolved, that is, one relating to Section 55 (3) of the Constitution of Jamaica. He was advised of the remaining concern and of a change required to address it. That change had not been made when the House sat on the following day, July 14th, and the matter was therefore left to continue upon our return," she sought to explain.
 
"I have since noted public statements made by the Leader of the Opposition on two occasions that he was blocked by the Speaker from tabling the bill. That is not true," the House Speaker insisted, adding: "The Speaker expressed no view on the merits of the proposed bill. The issue was a constitutional one."
 
Attorney General's role

Mr Golding, in his statement, reiterated that the Attorney General is the advisor on matters to do with the Constitution, he reiterated, and said that advice was never sought, “which I thought was most improper.”

“Nevertheless, because of the power that the Speaker wields and the fact that I do want this legislation to be tabled, I have tried to make adjustments to it, and I intend to make a final adjustment so that it can be tabled.”

 



comments powered by Disqus
Most Popular
NCB Capital Markets to provide cash upfront...
Jamaica to undertake rural water supply...
Gas prices up $3.06; diesel up $10.50